Feet rating stats (578 total votes)
363
5 stars
5 stars
91
4 stars
4 stars
75
3 stars
3 stars
28
2 stars
2 stars
21
1 star
1 star
| Rating: | (4.93/5) |
| You Rated: | (click to rate) |
| Email me on new: Pictures Wall Posts | |
Gallery Settings
| Page: | Displaying Page 1 (pictures 1 - 100, out of 134). |
more info26 pictures were removed from this gallery.
Suggestions from Clips4Sale:
People who liked Stacy Burke's feet, also liked:
Comment section
The comment section is intended for intellectual discussions over symmetry and aesthetics.
Insultive/bigoted/sexually explicit comments and political discussions are prohibited.
Describing of fantasies is prohibited. Videos/links must follow the same standards as photos.
In short - stay classy ;)
Insultive/bigoted/sexually explicit comments and political discussions are prohibited.
Describing of fantasies is prohibited. Videos/links must follow the same standards as photos.
In short - stay classy ;)
* Enforced by The Guild more info
|
2016-03-15 01:23:13 The short answer "yes". Stacy is a PS so historically the rules are stricter on PS walls compared to mainstream celebrities.
|
|
2016-03-15 01:28:41 Here's the LONG version!
You're not alone. We're *all* a little confused about what constitutes 'Adult Content' here. *Most* of it is unwritten rules, passed orally from the elders in ages long past, down through the generations of Wikifeeters, and held by the "Keepers of the Flame" (Illuminati) aka Guild Knights. The site rules are under a small yellow link on the Home Page: ► wikiFeet has very strict rules regarding adult content. Edgy picture and suggestive poses could just as well be considered adult content. Cropping or censoring an adult picture doesn't make it ok. Uploading adult content to a gallery will likely get you banned, and the gallery locked. Beyond those written rules, over time we've learned from the Admin that any visible sideboob or underboob is A/C. Other stuff, like sucking one's own toes (like this), various provocative poses and such, *may* be considered A/C, especially if the celeb in question is a porn actress and not a mainstream one. Beyond the above, sometimes other stuff that looks perfectly (well *nearly*) innocent may be removed as A/C. Why? Best to get that straight from the horse's mouth (Eli Ozer, Owner/Admin): "Sometimes pictures give the impression of adult content, even though they aren't. When a picture is cropped to show nothing but skin and give the impression that the girl is naked, or if there's a close-up on feet that give away a weird/porn-like pose, I tend to remove it. I try to look at galleries from the advertisers' point of view (as I depend on them to keep the site going, and they have zero tolerance for edgy content). If I enter a gallery and get the feeling I've entered an adult site, I start removing pictures until it looks SFW. So I'm sorry, but I stand behind my decision to remove those pics. Also, please try to see things my way and avoid from uploading such pics in the future." Goooooood Luck! |
|
2016-03-15 03:35:28 BIB - you pose a very thorough explanation and Thank You. While I am a GK, I really do not get caught up in all of stuff that goes on here. Heck, what the hell is a Gamoto? I really do not know. I am both stupid and that simplistic.
I will pose this to all that frequent this page.... Why the hell is a tongue against a sole even possibly considered adult content. Am I the only person that has seen the ubiquitous sexual ads on this site? Is this a, do as I say and not as I do site? WTF? Every time I log in, there is woman in Hong Kong walking around in sans (painted) pants. I guess it is OK to accept money from advertisers that advertise nudity, however if there is one naked areola, we uploaders are condemned and banished to obscurity. Sweet Mother of Pearl, I guess the owners of this site have truly compromised their rules for cash. Am I totally FARKED UP here? |
|
2016-03-15 03:52:31 @InStep - Nope, not farked up. The Advertisers bascially wrested control from the dude who started and 'owns' the site. They say 'jump' and he asks 'how high?'
I hear a lot of complaints about the ads here, but I've never seen them, as I've used AdBlockPlus on Firefox for over a decade. As for 'Gamoto,' it's a Greek word, and in the early days of the Guild, we had a *huge* and ongoing battle over it ("GamotoGate") before it was finally 'accepted' by most Guilders. You can read about it here: http://www.urbandictionary.com/define.php?term=gamoto Also found my more 'concise' A/C rules post here: http://www.wikifeet.com/Abbie%285%29#thewall |
|
User rated ★★★★★(beautiful feet)
|
2016-03-15 04:22:48 BIB - Thanks for your note. I found found your posts to be quiet knowledgeable and sentient. Good to know there are some even keels out here. Always loved the form of the foot, however, I have seen some crazy-weird stuff posted here. I just ask myself, why would anyone post this weird stuff?. I have told women that I have dated, my fetish, and in all honesty, they are cool with it. The weird stuff I have seen posted here, is a little disturbing. I honestly can understand that those without this specific favor, albeit fetish, find us just this side of weirdo-phobia. I also have a preference (call it fetish if you will) for women that are small breasted and have a larger glueteus maximus, however I have not been relegated to the throngs of those that prefer peds. Heck, I a happy with whom I am and my preferences, and my honesty with those with whom I share my time, are happy as well. Just sayin'
|
|
User rated ★★★★★(beautiful feet)
|
2016-03-17 01:22:49 Got it. Thanks for the info
|
|
User rated ★★★★★(beautiful feet)
|
2016-07-06 22:55:51 I would add another wrinkle to this discussion. I too had a photo of Stacy removed because it was deemed to be "adult content". It was a photo of Stacy standing barefoot on a guy's stomach. OK, fair enough. However, unlike actresses, singers, athletes, etc., Stacy is a fetish model. What's more, she is a FOOT FETISH model. One of several fetish models posted on this great site. By definition, you could easily deem that all of their photos are intended for adults. So where do you draw the line?
I didn't think the photo I posted of Stacy as that bad. Sexy, yes, but aren't they all? |
|
2016-07-06 23:28:18 Feet touching a man or man touch the woman feet is forbidden here,only woman touch woman feet is allowed by no tickle or touch with mouth.
|
|
2016-07-06 23:42:48 I think what Mr. Torture is trying to convey is this:
@Mr Hate (guild knight) 2016-02-27 22:38:21 [Member since: May 2010]>"@Herr Grik...per Eli...... Feb 2016.... "It's all about context". "If a woman sucks her own toes *PS*, that's bad. If a man sucks a woman's toes *PS* that's worse". "If anybody sucks anybody's toes as part of a romantic/comic gesture in a real movie which isn't designed to get you off and has an actual plot, then it's allowed". "So I'm guessing an uploader needs to ask himself - is toe sucking part of the plot, or is it the plot"? "I consider a picture edgy if it is meant to get you sexually aroused". Once again, Eli's words." |
|
2016-07-07 00:11:15 @TRLB1 may have all or most of the excludees from "The Grikkening." We don't call it "Grikgate" because it's too easy to confuse with the 2014 scandal, "Gamotogate." ;)
I knew of six in 'Round 1' not including @Instep, and one of them has been reinstated recently after writing the Admin. |
|
User rated ★★(bad feet)
|
2016-07-07 01:37:17 @CULE23: BUT JUST REMEMBER IF IT'S A MAN DRESSED AS A WOMAN DOING THIS ..... WELL THAT'S A HORSE OF A DIFFERENT COLOR ...... CUZ WELL THAT WOULD JUST BE TO INTOLLEREANT....... CANT HAVE A THING LIKE MORALS AND OR COMMON SENSE GETTING IN THE WAY......
|
|
2016-07-07 02:56:09 @GeminiStallion>"WELL THAT'S A HORSE OF A DIFFERENT COLOR."
So are you, Pop. So are you. (:^p) |
|
User rated ★★★★★(beautiful feet)
|
2016-07-07 12:08:21 Photos of a man touching a woman's feet are forbidden? That's hard to believe. There are plenty of such photos on this site.
|
|
User rated ★★(bad feet)
|
2016-07-07 13:26:27 THESE ARE THE RULES. THIS IS ELI'S SITE AND HE GETS TO MAKE, CHANGE, BEND, OR IGNORE, THE RULES THAT ONLY HE MAKES.
MY CONSERVATIVE PSUEDO CHRISTIAN MIND SAYS THAT'S OK ..... BECAUSE ..... THIS IS ELI'S SITE ...... PERIOD |
|
User rated ★★(bad feet)
|
2016-07-07 13:31:28 THE REST OF THAT COMMENT GOES SOMETHING LIKE THIS.
HE GETS TO MAKE THE RULES I GET TO BITCH PISS MOAN AND COMPLAIN BOUT THEM AND LIFE GOES ON. SEE WE EACH HAVE OUR PLACE AND WHEN WE ALL DO OUR JOBS ITS EASIER. SO HE CREATES OVER SEE'S AND MANAGES A SITE DONE> WE ALL GET TO COME TO FREE AND BITCH ABOUT DONE NONE MORE LOUDER THAN ME. ( CAN I GET AN AMEN ) |
|
2016-07-07 13:43:52 Amen Pop!
@Solebro - We know, and we will slowly clean them out. I don't know what the current count is, but there are a lot of photos here. Anyone know what the estimated photo count is? |
|
User rated ★★★★★(beautiful feet)
|
2016-07-08 00:03:56 I agree. I don't make the rules. I can either accept them or move on. Guess I'll just accept them.
Hmm. I get a lot of compliments on my avatar. I just realized it could be a problem. Sad thing is, it's not even a fetish photo. It's a cover photo from a jazz album recorded over 30 years ago. "Foxie" by Bob James. Pretty good music, too. Bob is the guy in the photo. Looks like he's touching (or tickling) the model's lovely foot. Until this thread I didn't realize that would be a problem. Google it to find a better image because I'm sure I'll be directed to change it before long... |
|
2016-07-08 00:33:31 @GS74>"HE GETS TO MAKE THE RULES I GET TO BITCH PISS MOAN AND COMPLAIN BOUT THEM AND LIFE GOES ON."
Actually, he even has a RULE about griping about RULES! He recently posted an Announcement even about THAT, stating that there was to be no more bitching *on the walls* about his rules... if you have a problem, bring it to Chat or PM him or use 'Contact Us' to discuss it with him. And long ago (back in 2014) he got on @A-Rex and me, responding on a wall, telling us to quit criticizing the A/C rules on the walls. So there. |
|
2016-07-08 00:41:40 @Solebro- The rules don't say anything specifically about a man touching a woman's feet; I posted the rule above, 2016-07-06 23:42:48, as relayed by @Mr Hate recently.
It's about context, so your avatar is fine. Also, and the trolls all know this, but avatars and usernames are a bit of a 'loophole' unless/until someone complains to the Admin about them. Many of mine (including this current one) tend to be edgy or outright provocative (though usually not sexually). |
|
User rated ★★★★★(beautiful feet)
|
2019-11-20 09:05:39 Revisiting the Rules three years later, do the same rules apply to Wikifeet X ? As listed above, it's a bit hard to tell.
|
|
User rated ★★★★★(beautiful feet)
|
2019-11-20 11:31:09 Personally I don't see an issue with it but, that's just one fan's opinion. I believe there to be a huge difference between AC and someone licking a foot.
|
|
User rated ★★★★★(beautiful feet)
|
2019-08-31 16:08:10 Goldie Blair
|
|
User rated ★★★★★(beautiful feet)
|
2019-08-31 17:12:29 Thank You!
|
|
User rated ★★★★★(beautiful feet)
|
2019-04-12 18:32:10 Absolutely, far better than smooth!
|
|
2018-02-27 01:44:00 The womans feet + me when i was 15 = endless toilet paper rolls
|
|
2016-03-15 03:46:39 #barefootandjeans
|
