2022-01-26

Plump'n

2015-12-11

Exactly, i found them on a special site, an innocent site ;)

2015-12-11

That's what @Greycat wondered when a couple dozen non-adult pics were mysteriously removed from Franciely Freduzeski's gallery for no apparent reason and we wondered who was the culprit. Turns out it was the Site Owner/Admin: Eli was the one who removed them. That's his reply to my email: "Sometimes pictures give the impression of adult content, even though they aren't. When a picture is cropped to show nothing but skin and give the impression that the girl is naked, or if there's a close-up on feet that give away a weird/porn-like pose, I tend to remove it. I try to look at galleries from the advertisers' point of view (as I depend on them to keep the site going, and they have zero tolerance for edgy content). If I enter a gallery and get the feeling I've entered an adult site, I start removing pictures until it looks SFW. So I'm sorry, but I stand behind my decision to remove those pics. Also, please try to see things my way and avoid from uploading such pics in the future." In other words, the advertisers control this site, and make it suck some. The Adult Content rules here are more 1950s than 21st century, and I've seen pictures removed here for 'Adult Content' that were of mainstream stars on mainstream sports & women's magazine covers, as well as at public events.

2017-10-02

This is a load of tosh. Have a look at the WalMart standard Ads permeating the site. There's more AC on the Ads than on the site. Who is fooling who?!

2015-09-23

Yep no way people are giving her ugly rating on the feet, gorgeous soles and toes!