Marina Visconti
Go to IMDb page
Feet rating stats (459 total votes)
306
5 stars
5 stars
84
4 stars
4 stars
49
3 stars
3 stars
9
2 stars
2 stars
11
1 star
1 star
Rating: | (4.91/5) |
You Rated: | (click to rate) |
Email me on new: Pictures Wall Posts |
Gallery Settings
more info5 pictures were removed from this gallery.
Suggestions from Clips4Sale:
People who liked Marina Visconti's feet, also liked:
Comment section
The comment section is intended for intellectual discussions over symmetry and aesthetics.
Insultive/bigoted/sexually explicit comments and political discussions are prohibited.
Describing of fantasies is prohibited. Videos/links must follow the same standards as photos.
In short - stay classy ;)
Insultive/bigoted/sexually explicit comments and political discussions are prohibited.
Describing of fantasies is prohibited. Videos/links must follow the same standards as photos.
In short - stay classy ;)
* Enforced by The Guild more info
User rated ★★★(ok feet)
|
2024-03-30 10:58:12 Looks like she has a couple of toy boxes
|
User rated ★★★★★(beautiful feet)
|
2022-07-26 06:27:33 perfect russian girl
|
User rated ★★★★★(beautiful feet)
|
2022-03-30 10:35:18 Very sexy looking very inviting and in need of being defrocked…
|
2022-03-30 15:40:59 She's probably been defrocked ten thousand times
|
2017-06-14 17:35:05 Her toezz AIN'T PERFECT!!!
|
2015-12-06 10:47:53 Weapons of mass distraction
|
User rated ★★★★★(beautiful feet)
|
2014-09-13 02:34:59 I'm always lost to understand the concept of "adult" content that guides this website ...
|
2014-09-13 08:10:34 It's not really rocket surgery, but it does have a few quirks. In a nutshell, from the Site Guidelines (see Home Page):
wikiFeet has very strict rules regarding adult content. Edgy picture and suggestive poses could just as well be considered adult content. Cropping or censoring an adult picture doesn't make it ok. Uploading adult content to a gallery will likely get you banned, and the gallery locked. Beyond that, no side-boob or under-boob visible, nothing see-through, no pubic hair, labia, etc. There is a double-standard, with stricter rules for porn stars vs. legit celebs; the 'suggestive pose' rule is much more strictly enforced for the adult entertainers. That's pretty much the basics. |
User rated ★★★★★(beautiful feet)
|
2014-09-14 19:07:42 @ BackInBlack60
I think the suggestion of pornography - as the featured picture - is much more worrisome than a nipple (which is no more than part of a mammary gland) exposed. I think incongruous exposure of the nipple to be something more repressed than the clear and direct suggestion of a lesbian act. It is nonsense when it comes to regulating adult content. I believe that the administrators of this site do not see with good eyes images that suggest something heavier and not only exposure of erogenous zones. But it is just my opinion, not sure. Cheers! |
2014-09-14 19:34:37 @MP- I agree. There is only one Admin and he is the site owner. He is careful due to his advertisers insistence there be no porn here. You can express your concerns to him at the 'Contact Us' button, upper left, but he's heard it all before. The Guild can be likened to police sent to enforce badly and vaguely written laws (see my post above) and a lot of 'gray area' is left to individual discretion.
Regarding *this* picture, he probably *does* in fact consider this pic to be A/C because 1) It is a suggestive pose and 2) They are porn stars. But no one has reported it yet, maybe they will when they see this post. I personally only report what is 'clearly' porn by normal standards, but would justify/confirm this one if someone else reported it. What we usually tell uploaders is, "If you have any doubt or have to stop to ponder it, err on the side of caution and don't upload that picture." We have told that to the uploader of this pic, who often posts 'edgy' pics of porn stars, and has been suspended for it in the past. Hope this has been of some small help or clarification. |
User rated ★★★★★(beautiful feet)
|
2014-09-14 21:29:51 BackInBlack60:
I understand well your observation BIB60. I had some pics reported as 'adult', it was not intentional, just when I returned to the gallery I saw that had excluded a 3 or 4 pics. So I asked them to send me the ones that had been deleted, and promptly met me. And truly there private parts exposed, few, like nipples, but had. My problem, as an avid connoisseur of female feet, was that I applied my attention only on the feet of the model. If they were showing, I selected and paid no attention had been more than exposed feet. Now I'm very cautious. Thanks, bro, have a nice days. |
2014-09-14 21:41:37 @MP- Copy that! Just did same thing myself... so enamored of her feet I didn't notice the big BUSH hanging out of her robe (it was an outdoor picture too!) Was *so* embarrassed I'd posted that! Stuff happens.
|
User rated ★★★★★(beautiful feet)
|
2014-09-14 22:42:17 ha-ha-ha Not see the woman bushs? Only happens with foot fetishists.:]
|
User rated ★★★★★(beautiful feet)
|
2014-08-11 06:52:08 Great pic you chose here Comrade......loving these sexy pink polished toes!
|
2014-08-11 07:28:09 EPIC................you know pink nails on beautiful tanned feet is my ultimate weakness (closely followed by pearlers gamoto!)
|