Feet rating stats (52 total votes)
19
5 stars
5 stars
13
4 stars
4 stars
14
3 stars
3 stars
2
2 stars
2 stars
4
1 star
1 star
| Rating: | (4.13/5) |
| You Rated: | (click to rate) |
| Email me on new: Pictures Wall Posts | |
Gallery Settings
Suggestions from Clips4Sale:
People who liked Brooke Ballentine's feet, also liked:
Comment section
The comment section is intended for intellectual discussions over symmetry and aesthetics.
Insultive/bigoted/sexually explicit comments and political discussions are prohibited.
Describing of fantasies is prohibited. Videos/links must follow the same standards as photos.
In short - stay classy ;)
Insultive/bigoted/sexually explicit comments and political discussions are prohibited.
Describing of fantasies is prohibited. Videos/links must follow the same standards as photos.
In short - stay classy ;)
* Enforced by The Guild more info
|
User rated ★★★★★(beautiful feet)
|
2018-04-09 20:54:10 Its a shame these few pics are all there is of this absolute Hottie with fab feet and the best mouth in Porn!
|
|
2018-11-20 13:28:46 I have more, but can't upload to WFX. We were trusted not to post AC when pornstars were on wikifeet, but now can't be trusted to post when AC is now allowed, unless you lobby to be named a trusted user that happens a couple times a year. Not worth the effort imo, site is going downhill fast.
|
|
2018-11-20 16:51:48 @PPDouglas It's not that black and white though is it? You harp on about AC like it's this big absolute thing. AC of any kind wasn't permitted on WikiFeet and while AC is permitted at WikiFeetX, there are still restrictions, most notably penetration not being allowed so it's understandable why only trusted uploaders are permitted, as frustrating as it may be. If contributing is no longer worth the effort and the site is going downhill fast, why not put your money where your mouth is?
|
|
2018-11-21 17:32:02 I disagree that it's understandable, I think that's subjective. If penetration isn't allowed, it should be not only posted in the rules (it's not), but also enforced. If we were allowed to post here, there would be more content. Restricting posts, slows interactions. As for putting my money where my mouth is, are you suggesting I start my own site or something? I didn't know that I had to have my own site as a result of having a differing opinion on how this site is managed. Are we now no longer able to express concerns? I'm just bored here now, but it doesn't mean I will stop expressing my views simply because you don't like reading it. I feel the community is unnecessarily being fragmented, would like it to be more community driven. I will continue to express it from time to time, no permission needed.
|
|
2018-11-21 18:06:10 As you seem to be so fond of observing, enforcement is limited by the number of people who can delete.
Had you actually paid attention to Guild Chat, you'd know this site is very much a work in progress and that much still needs to be updated. You have been keeping up to date with Guild Chat and Announcements, haven't you? "Reminder: If you have a problem with how the site works, come to me or the mods. Don't bitch about it on the walls." If so, you've fooled me. |
